BPR implementation procedure:
an evaluation of important success and
Majed Al-Mashari and Mohamed Zairi
Liverpool University Supervision Centre, Liverpool, UK
Keywords BPR, Rendering, Process administration, Success
Abstract This daily news provides a all natural view from the Business Method Re-engineering (BPR) implementation method. It reviews the literary works relating to the hard and gentle factors that cause accomplishment and failing for BPR implementation, classifies these factors into subgroups, and determines key elements of success and failure. Finally, it explains how these elements influence the BPR rendering.
Following a publication from the fundamental principles of BPR by Hammer (1990) and Davenport and Short (1990), many organisations have reported dramatic benefits gained through the successful implementation of BPR. Companies like Ford Engine Co., CIGNA, and Wal-Mart are all accepted as having successfully integrated BPR.
Nevertheless , despite the significant growth of the BPR idea, not all organisations embarking on BPR projects obtain their meant result. Sludge hammer and Champy (1993) approximate that as much as 70 percent do not achieve the dramatic effects they search for. Having BPR repeatedly at the top of the list of managing issues in annual online surveys of essential information devices reflects executives' failure to either apply properly or perhaps acquire the advantages of BPR (Alter, 1994). This mixture of outcomes makes the issue of BPR implementation very important. BPR offers great prospect of increasing production through reduced process some cost, superior quality, and greater client satisfaction, but it typically requires a critical organisational modify. As a result, the implementation procedure is complicated, and needs to become checked against several success/failure factors to make sure successful rendering, as well as to prevent implementation pitfalls. The following examines the BPR implementation process by looking at the relevant books on equally soft and hard factors that cause success and failure of BPR efforts. The elements listed below are distilled from several articles and empirical research on BPR implementation. These people were then classified into a number of subgroups addressing various measurements of transform related to BPR implementation. These dimensions happen to be:
(1) alter management;
(2) management proficiency and support;
(3) efficiency structure;
Organization Process Administration
Journal, Vol. 5 Number 1, 1999, pp. 87-112.
# MCB University Press, 1463-7154
(4) project planning and management; and
(5) IT facilities.
BPR achievement factors
Elements relating to alter management devices and traditions
Change managing, which involves every human- and social-related changes and ethnical adjustment approaches needed by management to facilitate inserting the newly-designed procedures and buildings into working practice and to deal properly with level of resistance (Carr, 1993), is considered by many researchers as a crucial component of any BPR efforts (Talwar, 1993; Moad, 1993; Zairi and Sinclair, 1995; Podiums, 1996; Cooper and Markus, 1995; Sludge hammer and Stanton, 1995; Bashein et approach., 1994; Carr and Johanson, 1995; Bruss and Roos, 1993; Janson, 1992; Kennedy, 1994). Modification of praise systems, communication, empowerment, people involvement, teaching and education, creating a traditions for change, and exciting receptivity from the organisation to improve are the most important factors related to change administration and traditions.
Revising reward and inspiration systems
Personnel motivation through a reward system has a essential role in facilitating re-engineering efforts and smoothing inserting the new operations in the workplace (Towers, 1994; BjГ№rn-Andersen and Turner, 1994; Hinterhuber, 1995; Ostroff and Smith, 1992; Dawe, 1996; Feltes and Karuppan, 1995). Because BPR creates different careers (The Difficulty with Reengineering,...
References: Modify, A. (1990), ``The corporate make-over ' ', CIO, Vol. 5 No . three or more, December, pp. 32-42.
Modify, A. (1994), ``Re-engineering covers list once again ' ', Computerworld, Vol. 28 Number 5, January 31, p. 8.
Andrews, D. and Stalik, T. (1994), ``Business reengineering: the survival guide ' ', Yourdon Press,
Englewood Coves, NJ.
Arendt, C., Landis, R. and Meister, Capital t. (1995), ``The human area of transform В± portion 4 ' ', IIE Solutions,
Barrett, J. (1994), ``Process visualization: getting the vision right is key ' ', Information Devices
Management, Early spring, pp
Bashein, B., Markus, M. and Riley, S. (1994), ``Precondition for BPR success as well as how to prevent
failures ' ', Information Devices Management, Planting season, pp
Dernier-ne and Levinson (1993), ``A framework intended for managing IT-enabled change ' ', Sloan
Management Assessment, Summer, pp
Berrington, C. and Oblich, R. (1995), ``Translating reengineering into bottom-line results ' ',
Commercial Engineering, January, pp
Bhatt, G. (1996), ``Enterprise data systems the usage and organization process improvement
initiative: a great empirical study ' ', Management Division at the The southern area of Illinois
BjГ№rn-Andersen, N. and Turner, J. (1994), ``Creating the twenty-first century business: the
metamorphosis of action ' ', in Baskerville, R., Smithson, S., Ngwenyama, O
Boyle, R. (1995), ``Avoiding prevalent pitfalls of reengineering ' ', Administration Accounting, Vol. 77
Boynton, A., Jacobs, G. and Zmud, R. (1992), ``Whose responsibility is IT supervision? ' ', Sloan
Administration Review, Summer season, pp
Brancheau, J., Janz, B. and Wetherbee, J. (1996), ``Key issues in information devices management:
1994-1995 SIM Delphi results ' ', MIS Quarterly, Summer, pp
Broadbent, M. and Weill, L. (1997), ``Management by Saying: how business and THIS managers may
create IT infrastructures ' ', Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp
Bruss, T. and Roos, H. (1993), ``Operations, preparedness and culture: don not reengineer with no
considering them ' ', Inform, April, pp
Buday, R. (1993), ``Reengineering a single firm is product development and another is service
delivery ' ', Planning Assessment, Vol
Business Process Re-engineering RIP (1996), People Managing, 2nd May possibly.
Caron, M., Jarvenpaa, T. and Stoddard, D. (1994), ``Business reengineering at CIGNA corporation:
encounters and lessons from the initially five years ' ', MIS Quarterly, Vol
Carr, D. (1993), ``Managing for effective business process renovate ' ', Cost Administration, Fall, pp.
Carr, D. and Johansson (1995), Best Practices in Reengineering: What Performs and What Doesn 't in
the Reengineering Procedure, McGraw-Hill, Nyc, NY.
Champy, J. (1995), Reengineering Supervision В± the Mandate achievable Leadership, Harper
Business, London, uk.
Clemmer, T. (1994), ``Process re-engineering and process improvement В± no either/or choice ' ',
CMA Journal, June, pp
Cole, C., Clark, M. and Nemec, C. (1993), ``Reengineering data systems in Cincinnati
Milacron ' ', Planning Assessment, Vol
Cooper, R. and Markus, M. (1995), ``Human Reengineering ' ', Sloan Management Review, Summer,
Coulson-Thomas, C. (Ed. ) (1994), Business Process Reengineering: Myth and Reality, Kogan Page,
CSC Index (1994), State of Reengineering Report, North America and European countries, CSC Index, Inc.,
Davenport, Big t. (1993), Procedure Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology,
Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Davenport, Big t. and Nohria, N. (1994), ``Case managing and the the use of labor ' ', Sloan
Supervision Review, Winter, pp
Davenport, T. and Short, M. (1990), ``The new professional engineering: i . t and
organization process upgrade ' ', Sloan Managing Review, Volume
Davenport, T. and Stoddard, D. (1994), ``Reengineering: organization change of mythic proportions? ' ',
MIS Quarterly, Vol
Davidson, W. (1993), ``Beyond re-engineering: the three levels of organization transformation ' ', IBM
Systems Record, Vol
Dawe, R. (1996), ``Systems happen to be people too ' ', Transportation and Distribution, Vol. 37 Number 1, pp. 8690.
Dixon, J., Arnold, P., Heineke, J., Betty, J. and Mulligan, L. (1994), ``Business process reengineering:
improving in new ideal directions ' ', Washington dc Management Assessment, Summer, pp
Earl, Meters. (1995), ``Information systems strategy: why organizing techniques are generally not the answer ' ',
Professional Reports, Centre for Exploration in Information Management, Greater london Business
Earl, M. (1996), ``The likelihood of outsourcing THIS ' ', Sloan Managing Review, Planting season, pp. 26-32.
Earl, M. (1997), ``Information equity: receiving value away of information ' ', Professional Reports, Middle
for Analysis in Information Management, Birmingham Business University, London.
Earl, M., Rockart, J. and Ross, J. (1997), ``Eight imperatives for today is IT enterprise:
accommodating a radical switch of responsibility ' ', Executive Information, Centre to get Research in
El Sawy, O. (1997), ``Business method reengineering В± do submission software tool matter? ' ', Conference in
Information Systems in Florida, Internet: [http://hsb.baylor.edu/ramsower/ ais. air conditioner. 97/
Feltes, P. and Karuppan, C. (1995), ``Reengineering: getting down to the business to do
business ' ', Industrial Management, Vol
Fiedler, E., Grover, Sixth is v. and Teng, J. (Ed. ) (1997), ``Information systems effectiveness ' ', ISWORLD
NET, Net: http://theweb.badm.sc.edu/grover/isworld/isoehom3.htm]
Goodhue, D., Quillard, L. and Rockart, J. (1988), ``Managing your data resource: a contingency
point of view ' ', MIS Quarterly, Vol